Forkheads
http://www.forkheads.net/

What is the NRA, as currently a Gun Use Rights Lobbyist?
http://www.forkheads.net/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=18698
Page 4 of 8

Author:  RV-007 [ Thu Jan 21, 2021 10:47 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: What is the NRA, as currently a Gun Use Rights Lobbyist?

New tip.

About fixing stuck mags/magazines.

Sometimes, them maggie ammos just won't feed. The ammo gets stuck and shit. Well, the trick is to spank tha monkey till it starts ding ding ding! Out comes the sparkly sparkles! *winks* ;)

Neither speed loader/unloader could really fix that problem! Well, maybe the loader, but it might mess with the new follower types being plastic and all.

Just like back in 'nam, boi! 'NAM!
*pats knee*

Author:  SexyLilSeaOtter [ Sat Jan 23, 2021 8:17 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: What is the NRA, as currently a Gun Use Rights Lobbyist?

RV-007 wrote:
So NRA was a hunter's safety, training, and outdoors agency. Now, it's about gun rights. Unfortunately, gun rights about what? Some say that the police are the highest member population. Significant enough that the agency might be a secret/unofficial police agency. It might be acting with some undercover agenda to take away gunz!!!

Some say that it is truly a gun rights activist, but like any form of government, checks and balances need to be confirmed. National Rifle Association? Well, better check if it's real federal or unitary state governance! Rights? It didn't have rights in their name!

---

I decided to make this topic a general spam because it's a fucking mystery on what's the NRA and its relationship with whatevers. Oh, maybe some dude inquired about gun registration to whatever it is to whatevers (as if). Well, the cops can seize them gunz for reasons involving straw purchases and whatsoever! Of course, you can start up your own gun collection or testify about a coronavirus savage frenzy! It's crazy out there!


So, as a gun toting american i can safely say the NRA is completely and utterly useless when it comes to actual gun rights. They really havent been all that effective at lobbying in a long time. Over the last 5-8ish years they sat on their hands while my state lobbied to put and pass two regulations on fire arms. One was a blatant contradiction to the 2nd Amendment and the other was passed just to be a nuisance to legal gun owners.

If you REALLY want to donate to an organization that will fight for the right to keep and bare arms donate to the 2A Foundation. They actually care.

Author:  RV-007 [ Sat Jan 23, 2021 11:42 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: What is the NRA, as currently a Gun Use Rights Lobbyist?

As much as I am emphatic to the peasants under distress of being deprived of their liveihood, I must point out the dire situation is applying to all across the land. Firearms are not enough for these pressing times. Fortification, and I say steadfast fortification, is a necessary factor of basic needs. It may not be the absolutely vital, but it is still essential. Note that the needs restrictly require a contribution. And when it comes to needs, it comes to the matter of not rights, but survival.

Resources, materials, and surplus is very sparse to spare. Yeah, maybe there is a religious obligation to fulfill, like prophets of the past. To even attempt this noble act risks attracting attention to the raiders and marauders that pillage every settlement that they could find.

It's like not even wild west, not even nam; more like iron/viking/dark ages, only greater. Blood curdling cries. Befelling of civilizations. YAAAH!

---

But yeah, back on topic, the NRA wasn't supposed to be a firearm rights activist organization. It was originally some firearms instruction group. I don't know how it snagged the opportunity pretending to be the legendary champion of the constitution, but it did. To allow one to manage/control your freedoms is practically surrendering your freedoms. I'm quite sure that NRA is the very prime example of this consolidating deceptive/manipulative usurpation/tyranny. I have already mentioned this statement in the first post, if not clearly enough. I personally don't think that any national organization safeguarding constitutional rights did exist, at least in the past. Even so, it's a democratic/federal design so a 'winner takes all (rights) by couping a unitary state' scenario would be nigh impossible.

Maybe it's not the NRA we should be pessimistic about, but rather inquire why the fuck the government is attempting to control firearm rights. I mean, we can just push and push, but it will never get to the bottom, the cause for restriction. The government, from national to local levels, is restraining rights for some reason. I think that it usually implies a need to impose (martial) order, or an attempt to curtail societal collapse, which is the tipping scale for utter societal annihilation. Societal collapse that be of freedom or oppression.

Author:  SexyLilSeaOtter [ Mon Jan 25, 2021 10:19 am ]
Post subject:  Re: What is the NRA, as currently a Gun Use Rights Lobbyist?

RV-007 wrote:
As much as I am emphatic to the peasants under distress of being deprived of their liveihood, I must point out the dire situation is applying to all across the land. Firearms are not enough for these pressing times. Fortification, and I say steadfast fortification, is a necessary factor of basic needs. It may not be the absolutely vital, but it is still essential. Note that the needs restrictly require a contribution. And when it comes to needs, it comes to the matter of not rights, but survival.

Resources, materials, and surplus is very sparse to spare. Yeah, maybe there is a religious obligation to fulfill, like prophets of the past. To even attempt this noble act risks attracting attention to the raiders and marauders that pillage every settlement that they could find.

It's like not even wild west, not even nam; more like iron/viking/dark ages, only greater. Blood curdling cries. Befelling of civilizations. YAAAH!

---

But yeah, back on topic, the NRA wasn't supposed to be a firearm rights activist organization. It was originally some firearms instruction group. I don't know how it snagged the opportunity pretending to be the legendary champion of the constitution, but it did. To allow one to manage/control your freedoms is practically surrendering your freedoms. I'm quite sure that NRA is the very prime example of this consolidating deceptive/manipulative usurpation/tyranny. I have already mentioned this statement in the first post, if not clearly enough. I personally don't think that any national organization safeguarding constitutional rights did exist, at least in the past. Even so, it's a democratic/federal design so a 'winner takes all (rights) by couping a unitary state' scenario would be nigh impossible.

Maybe it's not the NRA we should be pessimistic about, but rather inquire why the fuck the government is attempting to control firearm rights. I mean, we can just push and push, but it will never get to the bottom, the cause for restriction. The government, from national to local levels, is restraining rights for some reason. I think that it usually implies a need to impose (martial) order, or an attempt to curtail societal collapse, which is the tipping scale for utter societal annihilation. Societal collapse that be of freedom or oppression.


IMO the federal government (see example: President Kamalah) would never be able fully ban guns or regulate them like how most people think. There are far to many congressman who would not do that. Worst they can do is make knee jerk reactions (see bump stocks or possibly see FRT drop in triggers for the future)
I mean yeah, the evil powers that be in our government COULD use something like say covid 19 or say civil unrest to make a move on guns. But i doubt it, to many Americans would fight as soon as they hear that federal Gestapo knock. It would behove the federal gubment to be patient and wait for the state gubment to slowly but surly undermine the 2A. Then they would make their move.

But what the fuck do i know. I bounced out to literally the middle of the Olympic forest as soon as covid hit. If the gubment made a move i wouldn't know for days.

Author:  RV-007 [ Fri Jan 29, 2021 11:57 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: What is the NRA, as currently a Gun Use Rights Lobbyist?

Man, I would go on my business, but here comes the proposals!

There is said of a federal weapons registration proposal, it will include everything. And if you're down with that, they have to make the information public access?! A very great way to expose strategic planning to criminals! And this is still a violation of federal states' rights!

There is a proposal of a federal general license. That means a license (plus renewal) required to own firearms! This is definitely a money scam! Not even ca is that bad! At least it respects citizenship, residency identification, and other legal visas (levels). License very national ny level. Very unitary state central government! IT IS DEFINITELY A UNCONSTITUTIONAL DISARMAMENT VIOLATION! Tell that to Adolf Hitler! Big Brother environment I say! And this is still a violation of federal states' rights!

There is a crackdown proposal on .50bmg caliber ammunition, which is already pretty much very very big, heavy, and expensive overall. It's usually for the big boys, ones to take down mechanized units. It's fairly military, but I'm sure the cops have a special department just in case. Despite the powerful properties, it's still a damn bullet, not some super duper weapon of mass destruction (it's not a nuke). Stop treating these bullets like fucking nukes, they are not nukes! Hot potato? Hot potato? And this is still a violation of federal states' rights!

---

I don't know, but I get the feeling that this is what we get for putting women of a certain degree, in power. To disarm every fucking person is just based on the criminal fear of guns. Maybe, it's the capitol riots ([mass] picketing would have worked anyways, it's quite legal), but I'm sure that there is common sense to be mindful. I don't want to be a sexist, but most of the men do speak ill about women infringing and tampering with gun rights. Not even Obama was that aggressive, but probably in reaction to some events. I'm suspicious of Kamala for incompetence, but she ain't the only one women in power. If shit happens like this, we need to go back middle ages. Sword and scabbards, axes, pirate, ninja, etc. Hell, we need to allow magic, the dark arts, cannibalism, and sacrifices if this keeps up.

WE NEED TO SHUTDOWN THE FED GOV! WE NEED TO SHUTDOWN THE TECH PROGRESS, BUT FOR QUITE A LONG LONG WHILE!
Will even the corona recession down the federal budget?
I did mention picketing, but it's quite the exhaustive effort. Sad sad stories come from picketing.

Author:  RV-007 [ Mon Feb 01, 2021 12:36 am ]
Post subject:  Re: What is the NRA, as currently a Gun Use Rights Lobbyist?

I read that them funky bills came from a ny-born texas rep! Them nys are just evil! They're everywhere! WTF!

I know it's probably a unpopular set of bills, but it's always the nys trying to grapple for PAWA!

MO FED GOV SHUTDOWN WOULD BE NECESSARY! MO FURLOUGHS TOO!!!

Author:  SexyLilSeaOtter [ Mon Feb 01, 2021 6:43 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: What is the NRA, as currently a Gun Use Rights Lobbyist?

NY and any politically motivated person from there needs to DIF.
I recently moved to south east Texas a while ago and stayed for a good part of a year and the amount of hate for the amount of politically left leaning people moving there from places like California, Oregon, Washington and New York are numerous and the natives FUCKING HATE them because they flee from there respective blue states that their own political leanings have absolutely FUCKED over Tax wise and now they are trying to turn Texas into the same.IFSYN first month I was there some dude tried started a fucking fight with me because my cars plates from Washington. I felt like a fucking black guy in early 1900s Georgia, second fucking time in my life I have had some use the cliché “we don’t like your fucking types around here you best git before something bad happens” first time being when I asked for a pack of Newport menthol at a general store in a small desert town in East-WA.

Author:  RV-007 [ Mon Feb 01, 2021 9:49 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: What is the NRA, as currently a Gun Use Rights Lobbyist?

I don't know about the other states being NY. They could be actually more tame than DC itself! DC is like the man! Hopefully, there is enough security guards to be of assistance when self-defense without arms arises.

I don't think border states are too gun control just because of the risks of a border with a different country (no matter how neighborly they be). Areas around state borders and any rural areas (with a sparse population) are usually gun rights zones. Some of those areas have valuable (natural) resources, even if they are empty lots. It's probably better with potential.

People in gun rights states are probably afraid of the potential confiscation and are wary of the unexpected changes to come. If your post is the case, then it's like each state is its own country, but they might lack for a better word, their own state embassy. State to state politics. Hell, if there is some identification of state citizenship and migrant alien, that be something. I'm sure that it's not too cool to just be a migrant resident, but it's probably still cool.

There are a few other states like NY. It's a shame that state rights are not respected like a home. It's like they tromp into your house, and say, "WHO SAYS DIS UR HOUSE? RIGHTS? WAT RIGHTS?".

Author:  SexyLilSeaOtter [ Wed Feb 03, 2021 7:13 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: What is the NRA, as currently a Gun Use Rights Lobbyist?

RV-007 wrote:
I don't know about the other states being NY. They could be actually more tame than DC itself! DC is like the man! Hopefully, there is enough security guards to be of assistance when self-defense without arms arises.

I don't think border states are too gun control just because of the risks of a border with a different country (no matter how neighborly they be). Areas around state borders and any rural areas (with a sparse population) are usually gun rights zones. Some of those areas have valuable (natural) resources, even if they are empty lots. It's probably better with potential.

People in gun rights states are probably afraid of the potential confiscation and are wary of the unexpected changes to come. If your post is the case, then it's like each state is its own country, but they might lack for a better word, their own state embassy. State to state politics. Hell, if there is some identification of state citizenship and migrant alien, that be something. I'm sure that it's not too cool to just be a migrant resident, but it's probably still cool.

There are a few other states like NY. It's a shame that state rights are not respected like a home. It's like they tromp into your house, and say, "WHO SAYS DIS UR HOUSE? RIGHTS? WAT RIGHTS?".


That’s what’s really bizarre to me about CA, they have really strict gun policies but are a border state to a different country
Like I mentioned before I doubt there would be an outright confiscation or outright ban but a lot of the gun party think the opposite. Some of my moms side of her family on my Facebook are the “oil your guns, trumps still president just you watch. Revolution “ type and people like that fucking annoy me because they make the right seem like simple nut jobs.
TBF the more I think about it now would be the time to steamroll gun ban legislation the Republican Party is not just split but in utter fucking chaos right now. A lot of them are switching sides and just might give up their views on 2A to fit in with their new voters.

Author:  RV-007 [ Wed Feb 03, 2021 8:38 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: What is the NRA, as currently a Gun Use Rights Lobbyist?

I'm just glad that CA ain't a totally urban state. Usually urban areas have more stricter gun control laws due to not a higher population, but a denser clumping of population.

A outright ban might not be possible, but it's the matter of control over rights and freedoms. Let us just say that a certain Timothy Sullivan passed his Sullivan Act. That just means that issuance of the license was/is preferred to more upper class. The rest will just have to do without the license. It's like they penalize based on the background of most criminals, even though there are lawful citizens. Restrictions are supposed to protect, but hinder the benefit of convenient safety. NY SAFE Act is the most recent gun control law. Maybe, it isn't a outright ban, but for sure, it infringes, not support, upon firearm rights.

I admit that Trump supporters are looney because I seen some of them starting that Capitol riot. Makes them look bad.

The Republican Party is probably dealing with the Trump fiasco because it was so so terrible and horrendous to stand with the riots. It's a little too much dependence on a single person. There is a democratic system in place, it is designed to deal with political/governmental/municipal flaws. There are other ways to influence the outcome outside the branches. They don't have to be disruptive. Protests, sit-ins, pickets, signs, billboards, canvassing, bumper stickers, delays, filibuster, government shutdowns, furloughs, budget control, issue weights, and etc. I think that the 2A is still relevant, especially in the corona recession times. State levels may differ from the federal junction, and each is its own unique life. To even cater to the new voter audience, is to risk losing your old voter audience. It's like the Trump scenario again! Maybe a different strategy should be in place? Law enforcement is already taking a toll with the blm and rising crime rates. Service may be put on hold. Until then, you got yourself to fend off. Very reasonable argument right there.

Author:  「H A N Z O」 [ Fri Feb 05, 2021 11:56 am ]
Post subject:  Re: What is the NRA, as currently a Gun Use Rights Lobbyist?

I see Hanson hasn’t changed in over a decade.
I see Hanson hasn’t changed in over a decade.
I see Hanson hasn’t changed in over a decade.
I see Hanson hasn’t changed in over a decade.
I see Hanson hasn’t changed in over a decade.
I see Hanson hasn’t changed in over a decade.
I see Hanson hasn’t changed in over a decade.
I see Hanson hasn’t changed in over a decade.
I see Hanson hasn’t changed in over a decade.
I see Hanson hasn’t changed in over a decade.
I see Hanson hasn’t changed in over a decade.
I see Hanson hasn’t changed in over a decade.
I see Hanson hasn’t changed in over a decade.
I see Hanson hasn’t changed in over a decade.
I see Hanson hasn’t changed in over a decade.
I see Hanson hasn’t changed in over a decade.
I see Hanson hasn’t changed in over a decade.
I see Hanson hasn’t changed in over a decade.
I see Hanson hasn’t changed in over a decade.
I see Hanson hasn’t changed in over a decade.
I see Hanson hasn’t changed in over a decade.
I see Hanson hasn’t changed in over a decade.

Author:  RV-007 [ Tue Feb 09, 2021 9:53 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: What is the NRA, as currently a Gun Use Rights Lobbyist?

Well, now, a republican senator from florida, is trying to pass a bill to politically repress people by introducing a bar on arms for any under investigation. Well, Macro Rubio mentioned domestic terrorism, but who's that gonna be? The Trumpers? Right wing men? Capitol rioters? Who knows?

Is this a good thing? Well, it just takes an investigation to violate the writ habeas corpus, presumption of innocence, and verdict. That's like political repression and extrajudical killing right there.

I say that it is overdoing it since the florida's shooting incident.

Author:  RV-007 [ Sat Feb 13, 2021 3:22 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: What is the NRA, as currently a Gun Use Rights Lobbyist?

Anyways, back to non-exciting things!

Given the fucking panic with goods and ammo sales, I have to put up a stop to the hype herding.

The pricing of these products, especially the (maybe or soon to be spent) ammo, is quite the number! For most average (by military standard) round deviations, each round can cost to nearly $1.00 dollar! That's like $1/round! Fuck!

You are quite literally shooting away about one dollar for each shot fired! If you don't watch the cons in your choice of poison, you'll be spending into bankruptcy, or even homelessness! Given the matter of the recession, it's quite literally the bitch, is it?

---

Me, I getting skeptical about this buy buy buy thing, you know?

If this is the norm in the goods market, then what about the third/poor world countries? Surely, they don't make that much to match one unit of standardized (first world country) currency. How can they purchase at least (seemingly) cheaper products like it's nothing? Is the ammo standard also cheaper? I doubt it. How is this a standard? I also doubt that there is any entity that can take on this new market demand.

Author:  RV-007 [ Sun Feb 14, 2021 1:36 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: What is the NRA, as currently a Gun Use Rights Lobbyist?

Oh, if you go shopping for goods or anything related to such, expect possible political/societal affiliations. One thing for sure, there are Trump supporters or some right wing thing.

I don't know/trust about goods stores (or maybe even companies) putting up their political/societal pamphlets and brochures. Much less asking about political/societal bias. I guess it's their constitutional right/freedom, but the constitution itself, provides the good right/freedom to all citizens at the least. To deny such rights, is as un-American and unconstitutional. Now, it doesn't have to be a outright denial, it could be some excuse as a cover-up. I don't think it's their right to refuse service based on political/societal bias. No matter how right, or left, the constitution is written on the ideals of freedom, no matter how fickle the natural cycle be. Now, if it's a failure to service, due to circumstances out of one's control, I'll understand. That's natural as it gets. All I'm trying to say is that there are a plenty of crazy fucks out there, and I'm not talking about good nuts! The crazy fucks I'm talking about is extreme right wingers. According to them, it's like trying to argue that only extreme right wingers should have good rights/freedoms. It's definitely good control under extreme right wing. POWER OBSESSION. That's some heavy reicher rite there.

Other than that, I get that most people may see good people in the potential image of at least some psychopath. It may borderline to political/societal extremes, particularly on the advocacy of violence. In fact, I suspected that undercover extreme right wingers, over the years, are secretly pushing an agenda for good control under their authority. It's like they preparing for war or something. They got some war state mentality, that's what it is. That's what it is, boi!

I do see both spoken and written voices, promoting let's say, glock. It is technically Austrian in origin, but there are various controversies that no one seems to talk about, anymore. Adolf Hitler, himself, was born in Austria, so got to be careful about what's going on. Gaston Glock was born before the reich as well. It is noted that mister Glock contributed to the Freedom Party of Austria, which is said to be quite far-right. It is said that Austria did have some relations with Germany in the past.

I personally don't want to meddle into affairs, but it comes to the point where imperialism/militarism/extremism is on the breach/brink, of deth! While I don't like reining in good control, I don't like what others do to dominate the good industry. It's like a unitary state monopoly, and to is ready to war. What we need, is a focus on good rights/freedoms. Instead of letting secret Nazis get away with armaments to do harm, people can purchase alternatives. People can buy from entities that promote their own political/societal interests. Interests don't have to side with the left wing spectrum to clash with the extreme right wing. They can be central, moderate, or neutral. Left wing alternatives might give a fuss with political/societal opposition, but with extreme right wingers on the rise, it might be the natural equilibrium at work.

---

Alright, alright, nvm! Maybe it's nothing really like that. Maybe they just trying to push me into a another choice of poison.

Author:  RV-007 [ Tue Feb 16, 2021 12:31 am ]
Post subject:  Re: What is the NRA, as currently a Gun Use Rights Lobbyist?

Damn, I was hoping that I could leave my emo rant on the political/societal leanings of the certain prestigious firearms privileged for a while. That's right, privileged, bitch.

Anyways, I decided to look at foreign (civilian) goods. What I found out is that there is a a plenty of good control laws around the world! Maybe, instead of just only safeguarding the sovereign rights from domestic infringing forces, maybe we can safeguard the sovereign rights from foreign infringing forces. I'm sure there's a plenty of good control activists/societies out there!

Page 4 of 8 Time zone: Pacific/Galapagos
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/