| Forkheads http://www.forkheads.net/ |
|
| First World Unity? I don't think so! http://www.forkheads.net/viewtopic.php?f=58&t=18587 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | RV-007 [ Sat Aug 24, 2019 11:22 am ] |
| Post subject: | First World Unity? I don't think so! |
I overheard some bitch said, "I want to go to a first world country". I was thinking, "Well, you can suck dick, cuz them first world countries aren't always going to be getting along!". If some fucknut went upon a 'disinvestment' sabotage campaign, by endangerment, espionage, expropriation, or even devestment (also could be referred as development aggression [definition here]), you can probably constitute such acts as a act of (corporate/economic [probably an indicator of total]) warfare. It's like enemy spies, enmity action, or something, but with a bigger imperial goal/purchase targeting the whole of a nation. I suppose that the fucknut who do these kind of things, thought they go king kong or godzilla place after place. No. They ought to stay in not first, not second, not third, not even fourth, but a fucking hellhole, if there is any! |
|
| Author: | Odin Anarki [ Sat Aug 24, 2019 3:28 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: First World Unity? I don't think so! |
I would like to live in a 0th world country. |
|
| Author: | RV-007 [ Sun Aug 25, 2019 2:59 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: First World Unity? I don't think so! |
It's a sad fact that from the Age of Discovery, Age of Sail, and the Victorian Age, empires, colonists, rebels, outlaws/pirates, natives (guerrillas), and maybe even cultists, clashed with one another. Maybe there were still trading transactions during those clashes, but one may never know if it was for reals. Eventually, it just becomes another arsenal to wage war against perceived threats for something something great. Protectionist policies and economic warfare has become a jingo mixed in with currency manipulation and dumping. Even then, it is no guarantee to insure against domestic harm. Sorry if I sound like a broken record of a sjw fag, but I do got to say that it's tough to be at the top of the cannibal food chain. So much for first world countries! |
|
| Author: | RV-007 [ Sun Aug 25, 2019 11:41 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: First World Unity? I don't think so! |
Asides from economic warfare, there is also a need to safeguard (I am sure there is are physical entity bodies already) against development aggression (only that it is usually not named due to the volatile nature of economics [and thus is expected to be a matter of secrecy {it's a new/revived term too after a long history}]). It's a bit like economic warfare, which is usually for total warfare (as cited from wiki per se). It's more like partial warfare, but it's quite the aggression. It's basically another paint of warfare. Now, how would peacekeeping organizations would even touch upon those issues is not said to be addressed/settled (international intergovernmental economic organization [e.g. G#] is probably the closest, but I am not sure if it is like a world meeting thing, more like a coalition, trading agreement, or something like that [it's like economic issues can be resolved in a civilized genteelly manner]). Usually it's the military type of warfare that is obviously addressed/publicated in peacekeeping organizations. --- Development aggression and expropriation are usually opposing ends of the spectrum. |
|
| Author: | RV-007 [ Sat Aug 01, 2020 9:40 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: First World Unity? I don't think so! |
There's something I don't like about unitary/central governments, and that's they are the ultimate ruler of your being or something like that. It's not really a federation, where the rule of separate polities are emphasized. Read up on the separation of powers, won't you? --- And if somebody worships South Korea, they better check out what's the unitary government stands for. Forget your fucking rights! This absolute monarchy flag https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/ ... 899%29.svg could inspire this unitary republic flag. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/ ... _Korea.svg And I know that there's still a monarch thing going on in that land. Then, what's the point of changing Japan's governance when the one you're supporting is a fucking monarchical inspiration? Let the federal states know about it then! Let us be glad that Trump didn't transform the United States into a unitary/central government. Everybody would have been stomped at his whim. |
|
| Author: | Pantsman [ Tue Aug 04, 2020 3:53 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: First World Unity? I don't think so! |
RV-007 wrote: Let us be glad that Trump didn't transform the United States into a unitary/central government. Everybody would have been stomped at his whim. Lul everyone said he was gonna go full Emprah, but he didn't. The old media really does like fearmongering. |
|
| Author: | RV-007 [ Sat Aug 08, 2020 6:05 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: First World Unity? I don't think so! |
About the media, yes, that could also be a threat in persecution, political/social repression, extrajudical punishment/execution, and martial law. Yellow journalism must be put in check. |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | Time zone: Pacific/Galapagos |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|
