Forkheads
http://www.forkheads.net/

The Paradox of the Unusable Linux OS Driver Installation
http://www.forkheads.net/viewtopic.php?f=58&t=18860		 Page 2 of 6
Author:  RV-007 [ Mon Jun 20, 2022 6:55 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: The Paradox of the Unusable Linux OS Driver Installation
During my back to basics Apache port forwarding, I rediscovered, thanks to my stupidity, the sure fire way to broadcast the doom server on the broadcast listing. Despite the duh moments in the hard wire, It was pretty cool I must admit.

NOW I CAN HOST FOR JIHAD MONSTERS COMBOS! SO CAN THE BROTHERS CADRES!!!

No, inferior ones, you cannot win against Allah. Just burn in eternity for all I care.
Author:  RV-007 [ Sun Jul 31, 2022 6:03 am ]
Post subject:  Re: The Paradox of the Unusable Linux OS Driver Installation
After even more toiling research of Apache, I stumbled upon a I2P. It is supposed to be a Java-based anonymous service software suite. Services may include proxy search engine, email, irc, and web host. I will focus mainly on the web host part. So far, support for services are lacking, so are the documentation. Plenty of broadcasted sites now gone empty signal.

So yeah, it basically sucks. It is a interested take to have java undertake such a tremulous task. That, and anonymization too? To what extent are there factors as security measures? We're talking about ideal here!

Regardless of anonymous dis and dat, I thought about security and finished Apache's internal security configurations, module security configurations (in which some internal security configurations rely on certain modules and those modules needs protecting to close the loophole), and external security configurations. Anonymous dis and dat is great and all, but I have yet to figure it out. It's like one of those experimental things. It may or may not be common use like Apache.
Author:  RV-007 [ Mon Aug 22, 2022 9:51 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: The Paradox of the Unusable Linux OS Driver Installation
I am currently on a crossroad, but I want to finish the paths early on! A tip off in the i2p experiment to commence (what the hell is this shit?). Also, people have been hampering about the Tor browser for fucking years. I used it a bit before, but am not sure of its continued usage back then. Said to work againt eff's cover your tracks project.

WAT SAY U NERDS? ~_o

---

virustotal.com scan warning of tor network!!!
When using tor, please refrain from .onion sites! Even with a proficient vpn and disablement of javascript, caution is still advised! In fact, tor is not exactly as invincible as advertised. I don't think it might be good enough for anonymity communicated server roles just yet.
https://www.reddit.com/r/TOR/comments/s ... irustotal/
https://www.reddit.com/r/TOR/comments/w ... ttps_ddos/
Author:  RV-007 [ Thu Sep 08, 2022 11:12 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: The Paradox of the Unusable Linux OS Driver Installation
If you ever got some carbon copy documents that needs electronic transition, the default scanner software can readily help you. Of course, GNU/Linux isn't programmed to register button commands from external devices off the bat. Still, its strength in software allows the software method to function high well in terms of compatibility (or so I thought).

Yeah, I know it's not too useful, but there are circumstances.
Author:  RV-007 [ Sun Sep 11, 2022 10:47 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: The Paradox of the Unusable Linux OS Driver Installation
OHHH!!! Shudder butters!

I was hardening and amping up the apache/server security. I realized that css aesthetics isn't registering with html. Hell, even some sensitive files can't be downloaded! The same goes for the css file. I wondered why?

All I did for research is to research with search terms, "css apache server security".

I got this.
https://css-tricks.com/css-security-vulnerabilities/
https://gbhackers.com/css-exfil-vulnerability/
https://www.mike-gualtieri.com/css-exfi ... ity-tester
https://cheatsheetseries.owasp.org/chea ... Sheet.html

Like, holy hell, css is a security vulnerability? Something like selectors and unique readable attributes. No wonder independent j sites look so fucking simple!

Hell, even the apache site don't even use css!
https://httpd.apache.org/info/css-security/

I guess I would have to use strict html tags/elements then.

FFFUUUCCCKKK!!!
OOOMMMGGG!!!
:fireeye :fireeye :fireeye
Author:  RV-007 [ Mon Nov 07, 2022 11:44 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: The Paradox of the Unusable Linux OS Driver Installation
There's this game called Wolfenstein: Enemy Territory Legacy.

It is said to be a free and compatible game, but the media is not yet free.
It is a Linux compatible game. If you know about Wolfenstein, you know the drill!
It's usually a multiplayer online gaming experience.
However, I was able to get the bots and the online maps working in offline/singleplayer mode. Still, there's plenty left to be desired. Bot AI could have commands like in UT99. Might make the experience better. Maybe stretch the weapons/items roster for each class a bit? Wouldn't mind a trade off cost for custom selection. At least it isn't a account requirement, just a nick or profile.
Author:  Odin Anarki [ Tue Nov 08, 2022 3:29 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: The Paradox of the Unusable Linux OS Driver Installation

Link
Author:  RV-007 [ Tue Nov 08, 2022 6:53 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: The Paradox of the Unusable Linux OS Driver Installation
Oh, well, it is for linux.
You either can figure out how to install in .sh or flatpak it.

Forgot the details.
Author:  Odin Anarki [ Fri Nov 11, 2022 12:42 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: The Paradox of the Unusable Linux OS Driver Installation
RV-007 wrote:
Oh, well, it is for linux.
You either can figure out how to install in .sh or flatpak it.

Forgot the details.

This is why even though I love linux I'm yet to really use it. Using it as your main OS has just been too inaccessible to me.
Everything has to be so goddamn complicated when things are already so goddamn complicated and obsoletist with windows and too goddamn consumerist with snowlions protege
Author:  Odin Anarki [ Fri Nov 11, 2022 12:43 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: The Paradox of the Unusable Linux OS Driver Installation
Theres no good OS. And if there is, you aren't using it.
Author:  RV-007 [ Sun Nov 13, 2022 3:56 am ]
Post subject:  Re: The Paradox of the Unusable Linux OS Driver Installation
Odin Anarki wrote:
RV-007 wrote:
Oh, well, it is for linux.
You either can figure out how to install in .sh or flatpak it.

Forgot the details.

This is why even though I love linux I'm yet to really use it. Using it as your main OS has just been too inaccessible to me.
Everything has to be so goddamn complicated when things are already so goddamn complicated and obsoletist with windows and too goddamn consumerist with snowlions protege

It is mostly true that Linux is based on the older design of Unix. Linux is like any other old personal computer (eg Amstrad CPC, Commodore 64, ZX Spectrum, Tandy, and IBM PCs, and even NEC PC98 (this is more of a GUI computer than a CLI or TUI computer, same goes for most Apple PCs)). However, Linux was created around the year 1991. While it does espouse the CLI, GUI screens are already taking place. So Linux just had CLI that needs catching up to GUI technology. Alright, np. Chances are that you being computer savvy overtime, will see Linux as an alternative due to its developer nature.
It's a bit old school with the interface navigation, but at least it's a start to somewhere.

As for the Wolfenstein: Enemy Territory Legacy? Don't worry about it. I was just speaking on the terms of what Linux can/can't currently do at the time. I'm still pretty much of compatibility person, figuring how things works and what can be done with them. Yes, that includes games that accommodate OS compatibility.
Author:  Odin Anarki [ Tue Nov 15, 2022 8:47 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: The Paradox of the Unusable Linux OS Driver Installation
What linux truly lacks is laptops with ready to go preinstalled preconfigured linux distros as main OS's that cost under 1000$

What's up with that?

Especially when they rule the minicomputer market tho what the fuck.

My devotion to laptops may limit me but computers are not meant to be limited!
Author:  RV-007 [ Sun Nov 20, 2022 10:21 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: The Paradox of the Unusable Linux OS Driver Installation
Yeah, Linux is definitely learning. Laptops have that portability function so it costs extra.

I'm sure it's also an educator's job to encourage people to learn about stuff.

I technically don't trust minicomputers as they are usually deemed embedded systems. That means it's a system turned into a specific program for a larger/hosting system. One example is a microwave.

There's nothing wrong to be devoted to laptop operations, after all, I am also a compatibility person, although people would consider me as a compatibility freak. Sometimes, it just doesn't work out for them. It's also true that Linux is technically incompatible with Windows and Apple/Macintosh designs. However, my overall user experience led me to the conclusion that Windows and Apple/Macintosh are incompatible in terms of proprietary vendor lock-ins. Kind of like being enslaved to a master, and that means submissive slave to a dominant master. Oh, but I say Linux is also guilty in their own special ways too! ;)

The limitation of computers is dependent on the case frame and how much stuff you can pack inside. The highest limit would be bolted down servers with locker frames around them, cameras and security guards checking in patrol, and specialists keeping track of backup servers and data with the entire team.

In terms of the laptop argument, I will be honest to the fact that laptops are one of the worst form of computers. Its portability is a great means of usability convenience. You can take it anywhere with you. The bad news is that criminals can do it too. Imagine if criminal hackers are breaking into premises with their laptop tool? Servers would have to defend against unauthorized external devices and unauthorized access. I can't figure out what would non-hacking criminals would do with laptops, but it could be pretty sketchy! As for privacy, I cannot say. Oh, and laptops could be subjected to chattel trespassing. With all these cons outweighing the pros, it's no wonder that laptops are pricey not mentioning their non-monetary risks.

---

That said, ET: Legacy is just a assault type game, where objectives take place like it was some basketball/rugby/gridiron game competition despite the thematic difference. Hut!
Author:  RV-007 [ Fri Nov 25, 2022 4:27 am ]
Post subject:  Re: The Paradox of the Unusable Linux OS Driver Installation
Speaking of limits, linux's philosophy has been imagined as minimalist.

As for ET: Legacy, the singleplayer mode with bots does have some limitations. If you want excellent teamwork coordinate, look elsewhere, because the bot are just dumb! Simpler assaults maps are okay, but if you want winding secrets that require specialists to do teamwork towards a goal, bot pathways and intelligence ain't gonna happen overnight! Still, I say at least the Last Man Standing maps for ET: Legacy have a standing chance, even better with multiple lives limit. UT99/UTGold probably have simple enough map designs to get bots working for assault type maps. That, or the development/mod team really put in effort to get bot pathways and intelligence to work with maps.

AI in fps games just can't guesswork multiple paths and secrets. Nothing much, what can I say? Accomplished anything? Accomplished nothing! Hahaha!

---

Speaking of limitations, ET can't handle the strain of maps that work with other mods. Usually, I am happy with the canon's arrangement. Even as 3D games boasted its own as state-of-the-art, there's nothing state-of-the-art if it can't accommodate a team of mass bot activities. All in all, it is a developing project, much less than the freedom software philosophy since it isn't considered entirely freedom software. I believe its proprietary stay place restrictions on modding. That's a shame considering this game was built to play on Linux.
Author:  Odin Anarki [ Sat Nov 26, 2022 9:34 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: The Paradox of the Unusable Linux OS Driver Installation
RV-007 wrote:
Yeah, Linux is definitely learning. Laptops have that portability function so it costs extra.

I'm sure it's also an educator's job to encourage people to learn about stuff.

I technically don't trust minicomputers as they are usually deemed embedded systems. That means it's a system turned into a specific program for a larger/hosting system. One example is a microwave.

There's nothing wrong to be devoted to laptop operations, after all, I am also a compatibility person, although people would consider me as a compatibility freak. Sometimes, it just doesn't work out for them. It's also true that Linux is technically incompatible with Windows and Apple/Macintosh designs. However, my overall user experience led me to the conclusion that Windows and Apple/Macintosh are incompatible in terms of proprietary vendor lock-ins. Kind of like being enslaved to a master, and that means submissive slave to a dominant master. Oh, but I say Linux is also guilty in their own special ways too! ;)

The limitation of computers is dependent on the case frame and how much stuff you can pack inside. The highest limit would be bolted down servers with locker frames around them, cameras and security guards checking in patrol, and specialists keeping track of backup servers and data with the entire team.

In terms of the laptop argument, I will be honest to the fact that laptops are one of the worst form of computers. Its portability is a great means of usability convenience. You can take it anywhere with you. The bad news is that criminals can do it too. Imagine if criminal hackers are breaking into premises with their laptop tool? Servers would have to defend against unauthorized external devices and unauthorized access. I can't figure out what would non-hacking criminals would do with laptops, but it could be pretty sketchy! As for privacy, I cannot say. Oh, and laptops could be subjected to chattel trespassing. With all these cons outweighing the pros, it's no wonder that laptops are pricey not mentioning their non-monetary risks.

---

That said, ET: Legacy is just a assault type game, where objectives take place like it was some basketball/rugby/gridiron game competition despite the thematic difference. Hut!

Yeah well it's kind of wonderful if your also kind of a criminal because you know.. just disagree with the law
okay I'll admit this is the reason for my bias for laptops.
The good news is it's easier to not get caught with a laptop. It's so much easier to isolate evidence.

Link
Page 2 of 6 Time zone: Pacific/Galapagos
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/