n0th1n wrote:
Well, considering I'm not wearing pants... or anything else with pockets... it seems you've failed.
However, the earlier point is something I've been kinda thinking about lately. Money used to be tied to some kind of tangible substance. Now it is not in most of the world. And based on how it is created, distributed and controlled, its almost like a loose, subtle and highly sophisticated method of slavery. You set up some systems to make people do work for nothing, but they think they are getting something which will provide them with food and shelter, the access points of which the same system makers often control.
The other thing I wonder is if our current fiat system was otherwise designed with some good intentions with the idea of essentially eliminating money without anyone noticing it. Everyone just gets their work done and shows proof of some kind of work or effort to get the goods from other peoples work. Of course, it doesn't quite play out that way.
However, the earlier point is something I've been kinda thinking about lately. Money used to be tied to some kind of tangible substance. Now it is not in most of the world. And based on how it is created, distributed and controlled, its almost like a loose, subtle and highly sophisticated method of slavery. You set up some systems to make people do work for nothing, but they think they are getting something which will provide them with food and shelter, the access points of which the same system makers often control.
The other thing I wonder is if our current fiat system was otherwise designed with some good intentions with the idea of essentially eliminating money without anyone noticing it. Everyone just gets their work done and shows proof of some kind of work or effort to get the goods from other peoples work. Of course, it doesn't quite play out that way.
Sorry Noth1n, I didn't fail.
I used the qualifier 'Probably'
It is you who has failed.
