alright, from the way you responded to me I thought you were talking shit without interpreting my words. I agree with your sentiments on the thread, but bull will exist can't help it. I would never create a topic like this and even if I'm not sure gays are born that way(though I'm not not sure), I wouldn't ask whether it's wrong.

On that note if you were replying to me(which I know you weren't now), your argument had no depth.

On the actual topic though you were right.

I don't believe in a need to have opinions. If the time comes where I have to make a descision I make it then.
I believe in facts and how they shape things.

I understand you disagreeing with the thread itself, but that's not what we're arguing about and if you think it is then you're more Dense than anyone I know.

Also if you hadn't seen my words then why did you insult my stance and say you knew what I was talking about? You're contradicting yourself right there.

also your having a problem with me lies more on a need to fit others into forms. I don't think I have to, as I live by what I know not what I believe.

-

Everyone has opinions. You're not some sort of special snowflake. It's called common sense, it's called humanity. When you look at something that is obviously wrong, you should think: "Well, this is obviously wrong", not: "It's all subjective. Herp. Derp."

I don't believe I'm special. I have my beliefs and I have my standards I keep them good and seperate. If I see something wrong with my standards I see it as wrong. If I see something wrong with my beliefs I consider it in rewriting my beliefs.


-

What is our disagreement about? The only disagreement I see here is: You think you're smart, I think you're a dumb shit.

Our disagreement is you Insulted me, assuming you knew my stance on a matter of which I had none, then proceeded to clarify your entire statement, ignored that you had quoted me and even insulted me over straight facts, before eventually calling it an assumption which you had never mentioned before, and continued to state that you were right and that my non existent stance was in fact idiotic.

Also the fact that you went out of your way to call me an idiot is absurd. I think I'm reasonably smart but that's in no way indicative of me being highly smart. The fact that you don't agree with the way I hold beliefs does not immediately indicate you are right and I am a dunce.


-

I didn't. I said, I assumed. I made it very obvious I was assuming. And the beginning of your last post has confirmed my assumption.

How? Are you saying the fact that I made no stand on the matter means my stance is stupid? Not having a stance may be considered one and sure you can consider it stupid. But that reflects on how you see me, not how I see the issue. Although you call it stupid it's a choice, and it's your opinion that it's stupid.


-

What you know is a form of what you believe. There is a such thing as being misinformed. What you know is not always 100% correct. And when something you know is incorrect, it is a belief.